Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

"So is that your way of saying you wont answer the original...

First 7149 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
jambo12

42,719 Posts.

1

09/04/24

15:12

Post #: 73260392
Share

Originally posted by Glug ↑

So is that your way of saying you wont answer the original question asked.

"...."....So you think that a president should have absolute immunity ?....Post #: 73253336"..Note how the question wasn't limit to court documents, so do you want to try again...."

Obviously you can't or wont answer the question, so you try to change the scope of the question to help yourself cope with what was originally asked.

jambo12 fail.

____________

"....So you think that a president should have absolute immunity ?....Post #: 73253336".

The answer from most people would be a No.

But from jambo12 you get

Expand

"So is that your way of saying you wont answer the original question asked."

It's a nonsense hypothetical furphy.

I'm more interested in whether it's just that poster who doesn't understand the actual case or if it's widespread.

Regarding the acual case before SCOTUS:

Do you think that Trump is requesting absolutely immunity for everything, ever?
3 Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 1,305 more messages in this thread...

First 7149 Last