Share
21,202 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 1228
clock Created with Sketch.
05/06/24
10:54
Share
Originally posted by hersuit:
↑
So we are just expected to just believe there are no documents given they do exist if they actually exist and the FOA demands they be preserved and presented. Your silly premise is there can be no evidence so there can be no documents. You say, "You can't provide documents that don't exist" to which we say...well, hows about we subpoena the documents and if you break the law and discard or destroy preserved evidence we will hold you responsible but that's getting ahead of ourselves so just produce what you have. Now if the DoJ is following the law and they exist...even if incriminating...they'll supply them If they arent being truthful and forthcoming and don't produce documents...Im pretty sure that would be discovered So how about we just do it by the book Supply what there is to supply and let us see what we will see And btw...we know the likes of Bragg, Fani and James all visited the WH...so there will be documents relating to those visits...1,000% there are documents. And if they were so cheeky and oblivious to the risks...maybe there are things in there about agendas to discuss, reasons for the visit, notes taken, decisions reached, strategies discussed...etc etc etc. Let's see what they reveal.
Expand
'say...well, hows about we subpoena the documents and if you break the law and discard or destroy preserved evidence we will hold you responsible but that's getting ahead of ourselves so just produce what you have.' Finally you get it, due process. I await the Republican subpoena & any outcome.