"Note how a most convincing man...Bobulinski...well..."
Just because he convinced you doesn't mean he's convincing. He convinced himself that he was a witness to a crime, he can't identify what that crime was but there must have been one. Is this a whistleblowers are good day again?
"If Trump wins we might..."
Is this a sign that your confidence is not what it was?
"Why is the State Dpt stonewalling Comer's access to Biden's off shore account?"
You have the majority in the House, use it.
"Why are there 10 shell companies to hide the trail of money?"
LLC's are completely legal and are not in themself a proof of any illegality. Many people/corporate entities use them, even your man. Whose shell companies are they? Joe's, Hunter's, Jim's,..... You don't know so stop with this line of thinking. Even your main man Rep Farmer James uses LLC's should he be investigated because he's doing something illegal.
"Why is there a cheque to JB of 40k..."
I don't know. That's the job of your crack(head) team to find out. You didn't send your best did you?
"And 100s more valid questions"
I'm sure you do, although the validity of them could be questionable. Maybe narrow your focus and get onto something you can prove. This scattergun approach isn't working is it.
"And you lot go "Meh...noting to see here lets keep after Trump"
Nope. Mind you, if he does have LLC's and they are proof of some nefarious illegal activity maybe they should be looked at. You'd support that wouldn't you? What's good for the goose is good for the gander?
