Well, I think I do and I’m not having a go at you - I don’t put...

  1. 80,895 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 75

    Well, I think I do

    and I’m not having a go at you - I don’t put you in the bonehead bucket


    I just think that - I agree there’s been no large infrastructure spend for decades

    my point is that our society has changed it’s economic base in that time

    just a few things

    if we built something big

    raw materials-
    We don’t own the mines
    We have a far smaller mining force for the same amount of material produced
    We have FIFO for that smaller force
    we don’t own the airlines

    we don’t produce the steel, we aren’t using the coal


    For the building
    We use far less people
    We have a skills shortage
    we don’t build the vehicles or equipment that’s required for the building

    it just goes on and on and on



    then - on top of that- we have the same issues as we always had with using big projects as a stimulus - they are slow to start


    we will need rapid start



    we would also be building some projects that we only need if we’re going to increase population - which there’s a large popular feeling resistance for that.


    To me - the big project idea in infrastructure is way past it’s use by

    it’s NOT

    a. Going to achieve the stated objective
    b. It’s not in the least going to power Oz into a very high tech robotic/fully automated future



    we need big things and ideas - but, not that
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.