Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

So tell me why this hasn't been used on anyone before, but only...

First 212 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
hersuit

15,796 Posts.

107

27/03/24

15:54

Post #: 73086416
Share

Originally posted by Denial: ↑

So you feel fraudulent misrepresentation have no consequences in business and the actual law should only be applied once it ends in tears?

You really need to read the extent of the misrepresentation and fraudulent certifications from Trump's team that extended over a decade before you make such generalisations.

Banks are fined in the $B for much less when their internal processes don't pick up very complex regulatory obligations (e.g. AML). Note that these fines are still applied even when there is NO CLEAR INTENT to circumvent.

Do you understand the double standards you have applied here and the inevitable consequences of dismissing such blatant fraud?

Expand

So tell me why this hasn't been used on anyone before, but only used against Donald Trump.

Are you saying that no one else has done this?

Or is there some other mysterious explanation that you could provide....
5 Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 158 more messages in this thread...

First 212 Last