Trump may have been correct., page-340

I've always said - don't talk about treatments as a scientist. talk about them as though your 85 year old grandma was diagnosed with the virus two days ago.

Fair enough. But what you have to prove is that the treatments currently approved are inferior to ivermectin and how much inferior for ivermectin to be approved over them.
Simple task.
What are the treatments currently approved?
Why are they approved?
Why are they inferior to Ivermectin?
Why isn't the manufacturer of Ivermectin taking a promotional stand as much as those who are promoting Ivermectin?
Also, give us your credentials for your conclusions.

I'm all for regular protocols and research in ordinary times, but these aren't exactly ordinary times are they?

That's correct. The governing bodies are approving treatments as they are presented.
Do you think it unusual the manufacturer of Ivermectin is not promoting it as much as you guys?
Why?

https://www.merck.com/news/merck-statement-on-ivermectin-use-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/#:~:text=Merck%20Statement%20on%20Ivermectin%20use,%2D19%20Pandemic%20%2D%20Merck.com


Maybe Marum can inform you because he is using Hy Chlor and IVM as a prophylactic, which he sourced auf Deutschland. A little research on foreign websites, enabled him to find information on the recommended dosage. He speaks German, French, Spanish, and major European languages, so it made it even easier.