Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Trump may have been correct., page-478

First 478 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
gumUnderfoot

21,018 Posts.

178

18/09/21

12:00

Post #: 56171350
Share

Originally posted by skint: ↑

When an FDA advisory comes together you have some of the top experts in the country debating the merits. 16-2 is a resounding defeat for those wanting to roll out the booster to young people.
""While I would probably support a three-dose recommendation for those over 60 or 65, I really have trouble supporting this as written for anyone of greater than or equal to 16," said Paul Offit of the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
Others focused on the clear lack of data on the booster's safety in young people, especially 16- and 17-year-olds.
“We have no data on the safety for this population at all," Chatterjee said.
That will probably not stop HC pharma shills calling for it, or the FDA approving it.

Expand

When an FDA advisory comes together you have some of the top experts in the country debating the merits.

I wouldn't go against them on any of their decisions, would you?
Would you think you are better credentialled and go against any of their decisions?

That will probably not stop HC pharma shills calling for it,

You mean like those shills promoting Ivermectin against, what did you call them?

When an FDA advisory comes together you have some of the top experts in the country debating the merits.

I wouldn't go against their merits, would you?
Would you think you are better credentialled and go against any of their decisions?
Upvote

Reply