That is in the headline.endorses narrower use"The vote was to...

That is in the headline.endorses narrower use"The vote was to give youngsters the booster. It was defeated 16-2 . That is not a narrow view.

I wasn't talking about the panel's view.

You claimed there is some evidence the booster is safe in youngsters.

Now you are just making things up. Cut and paste where I did.

Just think, They were trying to approve a dodgy vaccine with zero evidence of safety in the younger age groups.

You are making this up too.

And you wonder why they are not trusted.

No, I don't wonder why. I am not paranoid and I don't have a delusion where I think I know better than them, like you do.