Share
60,796 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 727
clock Created with Sketch.
30/09/20
14:17
Share
Originally posted by acorn:
↑
During the Clinton/Trump debate, Trump slipped in a couple of barbs which I thought were quite effective. E.g. the one about where he would've put her in jail. I reckon that would've really resonated with his voters at the time. One has to remember that Americans really don't like Hillary anyway so the zinger really hit it's target .VIDEO This time going large on the interrupting just made him look like a giant Ahole imo. And, more importantly, made the interrupting weapon impotent. I'd say less is more when it comes to interrupting. I think Biden handled his son's drug problems well. Acknowledge it, talk about it, move on. Just about every family has experience in this area so it should be a non issue really. Interesting with Trump's accusation about Biden's son and the $3.5 million. I reckon Biden should've pulled out a few facts to put that one to bed for good. If that is the case, of course. I don't think Biden made the most of Covid. I think he let Trump muddy the waters a bit on that one. Biden definitely needs to sharpen up on law and order to strengthen his argument and sell his version better. I think all Americans are a fan of law and order. I'd say both of them are really poor on facts. Trump is well known for his lack of detail and his ' anecdotal ' stories which are usually just bs. Biden would do well if we could be better on the numbers. Trouble is, I don't think he has the capacity for that. I will be interested to see if there is a different strategy at the next debate.
Expand
IMO Trump interrupting was a way from stopping Biden getting a comprehensive answer out, Trump was continually talking over Biden so you could not hear what he was saying. Next time put Biden and Trump in sound proof booths and switch the microphone off when the other is speaking, think that is the only way you get a fair debate with out interuptions