So, is he on the sexual offender's list?
No, because it was a civil case, and that was an opinion, not a ruling.
The burden of proof is a lot less in a civil case. So she could get up and say whatever she wanted.
It appears to me somewhat like what happened with Kavanaug. Suddenly, when someone Republican is seeking an appointment to office, up pops a woman after all this time, saying she was asexually assaulted. Yet another Democrat coincidence, and there are so many.
