Hearsay is as good as direct evidence for the current sham, it...

  1. 42,699 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 1
    Hearsay is as good as direct evidence for the current sham, it can be much better according to some Dems:

    https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...uch_better_evidence_than_direct_evidence.html

    Presumably because it's very tricky to get someone for lying on what they assumed about a conversation they had about a conversation about a conversation. Good work Bill Taylor.

    Unfortunately, much as the TDS crowd want this to be a trial and explicitly call it a trial over and over again it is not a trial and therefore anything goes.

    Jim Jordan ripped hearsay gossipers one and two to shreds, amusing stuff.

    Still a long way to go but current chances of 2/3 Senate conviction, zero.

    Maybe the Dems should just go for a 'censure' vote and draw a line under the whole biased disgrace?

    I like it though, the more camera time shifty Schiff gets the better it is for President Trump in 2020.

    The elections ads are writing themselves at the moment. What whistle-blower? Never met him, never heard about him, is it even a him, I dunno, I just work here.

    Onya Schiffty.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.