Hearsay is as good as direct evidence for the current sham, it can be much better according to some Dems:
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...uch_better_evidence_than_direct_evidence.html
Presumably because it's very tricky to get someone for lying on what they assumed about a conversation they had about a conversation about a conversation. Good work Bill Taylor.
Unfortunately, much as the TDS crowd want this to be a trial and explicitly call it a trial over and over again it is not a trial and therefore anything goes.
Jim Jordan ripped hearsay gossipers one and two to shreds, amusing stuff.
Still a long way to go but current chances of 2/3 Senate conviction, zero.
Maybe the Dems should just go for a 'censure' vote and draw a line under the whole biased disgrace?
I like it though, the more camera time shifty Schiff gets the better it is for President Trump in 2020.
The elections ads are writing themselves at the moment. What whistle-blower? Never met him, never heard about him, is it even a him, I dunno, I just work here.
Onya Schiffty.
- Forums
- World Politics
- Trump Surges
Hearsay is as good as direct evidence for the current sham, it...
- There are more pages in this discussion • 12 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)