Renewables requires toxic short life span infrastructure but obviously the fuel is clean and free.The infrastructure technology is still in the development stage.But hey lets roll it out anyway. Fossil fuel energy requires so called toxic fuel. Where is the balance in the climate change debate. Example,solar infrastructure 'is' toxic. But clearly imo only there should be a reasonable balance as various energy technologies are developed. Sea water is hydrogen and oxygen,imo only the current research makes sense to convert seawater to hydrogen but to use less toxic solar infrastructure.ie only the solar panels are required not the toxic batteries. Energy will always be in a development stage and we should not rush into rolling out this current renewable infrastructure just because large energy co's and high wealth individuals have invested in it.
