So why is it that no court has see it fit to act on such...

  1. 2,112 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 1436
    So why is it that no court has see it fit to act on such evidence? No lower court. No upper court. Nada. Zip. Zilch.

    Perhaps they have used more than 1/2 their brains to pose questions...and have received no satisfactory answer. Such as (with reference to your numbered 'comments'):

    1. Thank you for that statement of fact. Can you also advise how many ballots remained to be counted at that time; from where they have come (ie mail-in or on the day; plus which counties); and how they will be counted (eg as-you-go or via batch uploads)? The statement of fact is devoid of context or 'scene setting' value without such additional information.

    2. What do you mean "counting stops". Who said so? Why did people go home? Were they forced to? Were they enticed to? Were they mislead to? Were they replaced by fresh workers? Please validate any answers.

    3. What does unsupervised mean? Whose responsibility is it to provide supervision? Whose decision was it to take away supervision? Where is it legislated that supervision is mandated? What basis is there to cast doubts on the veracity of the 'wheeled out cases of ballots'? Where are all cases of uncounted ballots stored? Why should uncounted ballots not be processed by poll workers following established rules?

    4. Do ballots have a unique identifier preventing double counting of the same ballot? Can ballots be fed through the machine a second or third time if there is an error in scanning, reading or loading the data?

    5. Oh, do tell. Is this like the 'credible' drunken blonde looking for 15 minutes of insta fame? If she can back her talk then why would her lawyers hush her up?

    6. See point 1 above. The blue wave swamping the red mirage was predicted well before the election. Caused by: a) Dems aggressively going for mail-in votes to 'turn out the vote' in heavily democrat urban centres; b) Trump shaming his sycophants to avoid mail-in voting as a demonstration of solidarity with him; c) mail in votes being counted only after 'on the day' votes were counted; and d) results from mail-in counting being uploaded in batches.

    7. It is not just the 'lunatic left' telling the half brainers (by your own admission) this. It is every judge in the state and at SCOTUS that has had the allegation put in front of them.

    Perhaps the problem is not in Georgia or the 5 other 'heroic' states that have returned to the Democrats. perhaps the problem is that the people have spoken, and Trumpistas don't like what they said. perhaps courts in every one of these states, and SCOTUS, see it the same way too.

    By the way...half a brain and small brained are two quite different conditions. I believe the latter is properly called microcefalia....just in case you need a handle for your angst.

    The election is over.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.