Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Here's the same hearing from the 'other' perspective. This 'star...

First 210 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
AH910

276 Posts.

35

03/12/20

21:37

Post #: 49331393
Share

Originally posted by PurpleXS2 ↑

Unless I've missed something, these "hearings" are neither judicial nor congressional hearings, and the "witnesses" are not under oath.
And not a word of the allegations nor the "testimony" thereto, have been made in person under oath.

It's one thing to swear an affidavit under oath, for which indeed perjury is the penalty for lying, but it's altogther an other matter to testify to that affidavit in person, under cross-examination.

Coz that's where push comes to shove, and the affidavit-swearing "witness" is likely to be charged, if they cannot avoid the implication that the affidavit was falsely sworn.

But hang on: I must go and check one of our favourite youtube flakies, and get the real truth...

.. ahhh, now I feel better

P

Expand

Here's the same hearing from the 'other' perspective. This 'star witness' was actually described as not credible by a Michigan judge in one of Rudy's failed court cases.
7 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

Drilling at Lady Ilse suggests gold-copper porphyry, grows footprint for Magmatic

PLS

Lithium production up 26%, revenue jumps 58% in June quarter for Pilbara

M4M

Macro Metals picks up 80% in Firebird's manganese plays; mining services operations to launch if decision to mine passed

AAI

NYSE-listed Alcoa Corp joins ASX through key JV acquisition

Pilot Energy awarded $6.5M in govt funding for Mid West Clean Energy Project

There are more pages in this discussion • 1,325 more messages in this thread...

First 210 Last

SPONSORED BY