My post was about the largesse accepted by members of the SCOTUS.
Extreme cases of largesse - in some cases provided by rich elites with matters either before the court or at some stage before the court.
Can you refute that?
Further, a secondary point was on the matter of bribery, and how the SCOTUS have twisted and tortured the interpretationi/.
Can you refute that?
And further - explain why this is not relevant to the discussion.
OR
Slink back to your Trumptard Sheltered Workshop.
- Forums
- World Politics
- TRUMP WINS! Has immunity
TRUMP WINS! Has immunity, page-267
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 90 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)