Theres a point political parties exploit imo And that is people take sides and dont want be proven wrong .
Some could call this belligerence when cognitive thought is taken into account and it is challenged .
Is very hard accept you maybe wrong or are wrong for many people myself included .
The easier pathway is to fall back into the past and try find debate to mirror this process.
The corruptible part is where you have political advisers to members of parliament that only see policy as good or bad for election chances and not whether it is good policy for the nation and micro manage the process along these lines .
Do you see any reason why an adviser unelected should be in parliament when debate is being carried out or when voting takes place?
This is the silent majority imo . And it is not a majority at all in the way the electorate perceives our politicians to represent them .
Just peel up how they vote then see how they have gives me a different perspective on this whole westminster system and how its been bastardised by the silent majority or so called one!
- Forums
- Political Debate
- trust labor?
trust labor?, page-39
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 11 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)