I find it amazing that the same people that are seeking the removal of Gladys are defending Dan Andrews.
Gladys is guilty of having a bad egg as a boyfriend and being a woman.
Dan Andrews is guilty of poor judgement on the use of contractors for hotel quarantine which has killed hundreds of Victorians. He appears to have then lied about the availability of the ADF, and then having a failing memory. A number of his fellow workers have pointed the finger at him and yet he refuses to yield.
This is appalling hypocrisy.
I get that both are under massive pressure at the moment and therefore the status quo may be the better outcome. But we need change and we need to locked in.
FWIW, I do like the comments from Albanese on Gladys, but I haven't seen him opine on Andrews yet. Maybe his silence is speaking loudly.
