trying for some clarification, page-39

dott ,
I do not use such language.
On another post about 1.5 year ago you made some claims re the ability of the closed loop process to handle variable salt types.
This is what led me to check the facts and to double my position. May be I should thank you for your loose interpretation and presentation of the facts.

Perhaps your wild statements are a blessing in disguise
but Only for those who check your implicit assumptions. So please posters do not come back with paragraphs of alternate opinions. Alternate (false) opinions are only useful where those who bite , thoroughly check them out. That is the moral of the story about wild alternate hypothesis presented as facts.