TTT chart thread, page-601

Its the technology they have that allows cheap powders to be used for the products and it is not labour intensive for China to have an edge.

For TTT, deals are much larger in size and accordingly would take more time, they don't have to sell via distributors or directly to 1,000s of customers to yield the millions in revenues. Just the few large ones they are collaborating with and then potential expand into new and customised products made economically feasible through kinetic fushion technology. That is the part of the business/revenue model that I like as opposed to other tech companies where $/customer contracts are probably in the tens or low hundreds of thousands requiring greater customer adoption for scalability of revenue.