tungsten agm melbourne 8 nov questions., page-3

Todays,

I was pretty sure they read it, too. When I hinted at one contributor being fed what I deemed inside information, it suddenly stopped. Similar things happend in the past when certain company comments IMO clearly addressed what had been discussed here earlier.

My questions relate to things of the past on purpose. Questions regarding the future are basically useless since management can not answer them clearly. They will always be vague and leave the exit doors wide open.

Questions regarding things that happened in the recent past though, for example what had caused the almost 200% overdraft in development expenses in Q2, could be answered directly by breaking out the numbers. It was our money, wasn't it? I think actual expenses of 1.777M vs. a budget of 0,600M do justify questions, don't they?