turning of the tide, page-32

Badfish,

Thanks for your clarification. It did help.

But there has to be a little correction there as well.

Such as:

"(Satori,

A CR via a renounceable SPP, like NTU just did, would be nice.)"

That comment was made by me, in reply to Satori and it was a little misunderstanding on my part (English, by the way, is my second Language).


Now the reply to DJ1 was as follows:

"(DJ1,

I said A RENOUNCEABLE RIGHTS ISSUE, not a NON RENOUNCABLE ONE.

And that is the major difference.)"


End of quote.

All is good mate. Just a little clarification.

Buddy