-
Share
24,386 Posts.
176
05/10/10
00:43
Share
Badfish,
Thanks for your clarification. It did help.
But there has to be a little correction there as well.
Such as:
"(Satori,
A CR via a renounceable SPP, like NTU just did, would be nice.)"
That comment was made by me, in reply to Satori and it was a little misunderstanding on my part (English, by the way, is my second Language).
Now the reply to DJ1 was as follows:
"(DJ1,
I said A RENOUNCEABLE RIGHTS ISSUE, not a NON RENOUNCABLE ONE.
And that is the major difference.)"
End of quote.
All is good mate. Just a little clarification.
Buddy
-