Hmmmmmm......
Unfortunately I can't find the posts, ( prob cause it was years ago) but i vaguely remember others (again, years ago) discussing this to death, where GD or someone else senoir claimed the opposite.
And to add weight to that:
on page 7 of the may 27 2016 annoucement (attached) explicitly says: "License fees recovered from BOTH the cream & applicator." Im sure it was settled prior to that annoucement, that any cream obj had "worked on" would provide royalties, wand or not.
Perhaps its a product specific clause,
Pethaps some products are only half obj tech,
Perhaps there is monetary recovery for cream "work" in another way,
perhaps the announcement is wrong/old,
perhaps matt is wrong.
I dont know,....... what I do know is:
Once again with OBJ, its contradiction and clouded information doesnt provde an end to this conversation for me... its Just one more in the "100 billion dollars" times this has happened - lol.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- WFL
- Two New Olay Magnemask Products
Two New Olay Magnemask Products, page-32
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 228 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add WFL (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.3¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.478M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
WFL (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online