So looking at one of our peers it seems things have changed. I...

So looking at one of our peers it seems things have changed. I appreciate they spent months jumping around because the SC6 comparison didn't include the full benefit of Sulphate or Tin. After yesterdays news from Nigel ie shifting focus from Sulphate to Oxide and HC members suggesting a spin off for the Tin does this mean the table is validated at the level it was intended?

Also we have some here suggesting FFX DFS is null and void/incomplete because of lack of Sulphate SS inclusion, does this new news from our peer suggest their DFS needs re-working for SC6 alone? Seems a feasibility study is open-ended to me so why such a hoo-ha?

Thanks in advance and happy to be corrected. aimo