I can see the logic and certainly looks good written with those variables.
Using the same assumptions for current state 5b in sales at 2.3% net margin = 120m. Which is your example is net profit after tax.
If they were achieving that i'd be much more interested/believer in the exponential or growth projections. Certainly don't think such net profits are out of the realms in the medium term either once ad-hoc expansion expenses subside and as you reference sales cost aren't linear.
Regardless even on that P/E ratio of 20 or 40 a 120m profit today would be 2.4bn or 4.8bn. So even on a healthy growth P/E of 40 that projecting that net margin (which is a healthy one) and would still have the company valued 2-4 times current MC.
Cheers for the objective response - I'm not saying your assumptions or calculations are wrong either just opposing views which is good for readers.
SF2TH
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- APT
- UBS Sell and $17 target!
UBS Sell and $17 target!, page-239
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1,295 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add APT (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
I88
INFINI RESOURCES LIMITED
Charles Armstrong, CEO
Charles Armstrong
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online