Thanks @Taurean7 ...that makes sense. I am still confused by...

Thanks @Taurean7 ...that makes sense.

I am still confused by that statement in the 4c, and then the following para which says "average monthly recurring revenue now exceeding $2.0m per month". My read on that is that if they were achieving say $2.5m per month then they would have said that. But they're not, yet, so can't, so are much closer to $2.0m. Which still leaves me wondering how they will be up 425% PCP. I did note that the 425% referred to "Revenue From Chemistry Sales" as opposed to just Revenue. I inferred from that that we might be dealing with a subset of total Revenue there for whatever reason, else why say it like that???

You are right though, 425% PCP is a better fit than the $2.0m per month. Time will tell.

Thanks again for the clarification. And please keep the charts coming.

Roy