From a fellow Dumb Smuck, absolutely and undeniably, lol, as a...

From a fellow Dumb Smuck, absolutely and undeniably, lol, as a long term holder of Admedus.

Is it a reference to a video, by Donzy; it asks ‘You and the devil, what is the difference?’, in this
’Donzy tells a very personal story on negative energy in the music industry and the media’, a correlation from there to here is ......?

Keep up your posts, doesn’t ‘hurt’ anyone to be challenged in their beliefs, if ‘shite’ easily refuted and countered, folk either open minded and acknowledging of contrary views or insular in their view points and/or ‘playing games’ in the case of one or two folks.

Negativity in the past, and even to present date, on this stock has, imo, been 100% been justified, by most metrics, imo, it could be classed as a ‘dog’; massive share dilution since inception, a disastrous history post CodeRed, (despite growing revenue), near total lost of trust and faith in company by RIs, and huge uncertainty at the present, plus huge capital losses for many, present and past.

That this is not mentioned, (as per Harry Potter and the name ‘Voldermore’) because it ‘might hurt the sp’ is laughable, the facts that count are above and acknowledged by any credible institution or astute sophisticated investor, imo.

So much more will be highlighted on resume of trading, either good/bad and or indifferent, the indifferent, arguably, could see this company sold out under 1 cent pre-consolidation, (it lives!) this from expectations of a very, very conservative figure of 30 cents plus by many posters here at HC, myself included.

TAVR ‘blue sky’ reminiscent of AI story, needs to be ‘backed’ up with a resultant deal and partner ‘signed’ up.

Despite growing revenue from Adapt IP the gap between inflows and outflows is huge, 30 mill plus (?), uptake from deal/s preferably to negate or massive CR in the making.

Bad; no deal/s tied up or further delayed, huge CR required in the interim, imo.
Company is negotiating from the ‘ropes’, hardly a ideal situation and quite prone to a opportunistic third party, if so and most likely inclined, imo.

Quite contrary is the view that while this is high risk/high reward that any ‘risk’ that IS highlighted is seen as ‘running the stock down, trolling’ ect, rather than countered and logically dismissed.
When the most ‘strident’ in their one eyed support (very small minority) of any company are proved wrong they then resort to the high risk/high reward spiel.

Good; current revenue, despite huge short fall and next to no debt, SIO as ‘backstop’ to survival of the company, though at ‘mates rates’.

Open minded to counter view points and willing to concede if I have erred, read all posts except for the one exception, open mindedness is not infinite!, lol.