I thought that was significant too Griff.
Someone (was it Fmx?) correctly pointed out that this is not proof as the portion that was sent to the lab may have contained less gold than the portion that was panned.
However it is also possible that the portion that was sent to the lab did contain just as much gold (or more) than that panned so this should be viewed as positive and potentially very significant.
undercalled gold in gh sample, page-2
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add PRX (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.3¢ |
Change
-0.001(16.7%) |
Mkt cap ! $5.294M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.2¢ | 0.3¢ | 0.2¢ | $1.388K | 556.6K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 29 | 23213615 | 0.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.3¢ | 16131856 | 20 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 14.02pm 26/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| PRX (ASX) Chart |