Understanding anti vaccination attitudes, page-8

  1. 3,327 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 5
    Your article is interesting Pony - it's about the movement we have seen over the past decades where people turn their back to vaccines that have gone through years of research and are based on what we actually use to called a "vaccine" pre- 2020. The same vaccines that have proven to be safe by our standards, provide herd immunity, prevent infection and have saved millions of people. The same vaccines that gave the term "vaccine" an indisputable reputation among most of us, living in Western society. The same vaccines that I was given, and were given to my kids.


    You and many others like to think that these are the same people that stand up right now as they are not keen to get "vaccinated" with a new MRNA type of "vaccine" that is forced on the entire western population? A treatment that is not giving us herd immunity or prevent infection. A treatment that, looking at Europe, does not seem to be overly effective? A treatment that most certainly should not be called a "vaccine" as it is works very different and benifits from the good reputation real vaccines actually have.

    By all means, if it makes you feel save take this new threatment or vaccine anno 2021 as per MerriamWebster, it certainly benifits some groups in our society, at the same time allow others to have an open mind and think for themselves.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.