Management cannot change the cost of the CAPEX by over $100 million. Just because they are nationals , just because they have connections does not impact the CAPEX cost that greatly.
I understand what you're saying but see it as irrelevant to the actual CAPEX cost because the modules/ plant will most likely be built abroad and imported. Good connections or not I just don't feel that the figure presented is achievable, maybe BGS and the rest are "overpaying" but it seems like a huge discrepancy.
At the end of the day is PSC can get a 1.2mtpa plant built for $52.5 million USD, who cares because it's dirt cheap and beats its competitors in CAPEX cost significantly
Undervalued, page-21
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add PSC (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
11.0¢ |
Change
0.010(10.0%) |
Mkt cap ! $52.65M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 10.0¢ | 11.0¢ | 10.0¢ | $76.34K | 745.3K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 50482 | 10.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 11.0¢ | 31999 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 12.44pm 07/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| PSC (ASX) Chart |