undoing the carbon tax -by regulatory taking, page-41

Opaline seriously, there's no point vomiting forth any of your references for me, I will totally ignore any AGW propaganda until I see a fair dinkum debate between Alarmist scientists and Sceptic scientists.

As it stands, the Sceptic scientists are lining up to debate the issue, they are obviously very confident of their position.

Alas the Alarmists scientists appear to be greatly lacking in confidence, as they refuse to engage in public debate, and instead resort to dictating, preaching and fear-mongering to the gullible.

If the Alarmists were so confident that humans are causing catastrophic global warming, why are they petrified of arguing their case? ROFL they won't even debate Andrew Bolt or Alan Jones, let alone a peer scientist with an opposing view.

You seem to think you're an AGW expert Opaline, why not go on the Bolt Report and debate one of the Sceptic scientists that you and your ilk continually denigrate? Bolt has a standing invitation to go on his show.

Go on, take up Bolt's invitation, show the world your superior evidence that supports your justification for a TRILLION DOLLAR CARBON TAX.