could you tell me if I am correct with respect to required g/t (recovered) that "would have been needed" to cover our all-in sustaining Sept Qtr costs?
- Sept Qtr milled tonnes = 262778 t
- all-in costs = $39.8 mill which requires 15762 oz (490253 g) at A$ 2525 (Sept Qtr realised price)
- so 490253/262778 = 1.86 g/t (recovered) would have been required
correct ? Doesn't seem too hard with what you have mentioned with respect to blending
Unlocking the geological potential, page-8
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
