I love the use of the words "role of human activity", are they alluding to deforestation, land degradation, over population, destruction of waterways, silting of oceans? Whoops missed something that nasty CO2? Is it a change in narrative?
Looks like the CO2 fanatics have realised that this argument has run its course and people are beginning to wake up. What was that other defunct slogan? Oh, that's right GLOBAL WARMING. Is it a final admission that CO2 is NOT the cause?
This may bring about the truth about the population explosion and the myriads of unwanted by-products as a consequence. Now only if we could cull the population a bit more - who do we start with? Maybe a 'living' tax should solve it!
Yes, I'm a skeptic about the whole CO2 argument/ hypothesis, but human activity - well lets just say I'm listening certainly more plausible than CO2.
