Hmmm reading the notice of AGM raises more questions & comments...

Hmmm reading the notice of AGM raises more questions & comments that those more knowledgeable than my can provide some guidance perhaps.

- Part C approval of existing TNG Incentive plans - "...c) to ensure remuneration is competitive in relation to broader market and is linked to role, experience and performance" - how do you quantify or view performance objectively if defined KPI's are not in place? No EIS, chair, Finance, etc etc...???
- Approval for Non-Exec & Consultant Option Plan, Options to Directors etc - if these were to be exercised by individual parties listed, does that add to the overall volume of shares in the market and therefore dilute my portion (assuming no additional top-up on my part)? There is some comment on page 16 of a 0.53% dilution if the 4m options to PB are exercised. So what is the minimum and maximum dilution exposure to smaller shareholders like me if some or all of these are exercised by PB, Rex, Consultants, etc???
- Perhaps I am raging without reason or ignorantly, but it does not help reading "If the market capitalisation of the Company remains above a trigger point ($50m, $100m, $200m, $300m, etc..) for a continuous period of at least 3 months, the Mr Burton's base salary will increase by the amount of the relevant MCIB payment (MCIB is market capitalisation based bonus of 15% of base salary to my understanding) - so the fact that TNG have been holding market cap for over 100m over past year or so means his base salary gone up but my investment by virtue of SP being between 10-16c through the same period hasn't gone up accordingly??? WTF!

Maybe I should stop reading and stop any further fuses popping!

Happy to be corrected if anyone's got a better or more accurate explanation of all this! Yes fundamentals are strong blah blah blah - only difference is board making some $ along the way in one shape or another and shareholders not quite the same!