Hi Lost and SP007.
Just a point when calculating the PE of the of PACs other boutiques (ex GQG)
In your above figures PACs total overheads have been deducted from that groups earnings and nothing against GQG.
Last revenues exGQG were $30.5m which would be approx $25 npat or 49cps. Less PACs net overheads is where the 31cps figure has originated.
That group are probably going to contribute an extra 10cps this year after tax. I believe way under valued.
With the Banner Oak implied 6x NPBT price range. There could be some exaggeration there. PAC will be receiving a bigger share of the profits until that milestone is meet ,suggesting no growth for PAC even if Banner Oak is growing.
PAC has actually paid 6x distribution not 6x earnings. Hopefully they grow quickly so distribution can increase
Just my thoughts happy to be corrected.
Cheers Greg
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Updated perspective on PAC Valuation (ex-GQG) - $8.375 is revised price
Hi Lost and SP007. Just a point when calculating the PE of the...
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add PAC (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
$11.08 |
Change
0.280(2.59%) |
Mkt cap ! $571.4M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$10.77 | $11.08 | $10.75 | $428.9K | 39.46K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
3 | 363 | $11.00 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$11.11 | 112 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 123 | 10.650 |
1 | 3141 | 10.610 |
1 | 1500 | 10.400 |
1 | 400 | 10.300 |
1 | 106 | 10.250 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
11.580 | 47 | 1 |
12.950 | 500 | 1 |
0.000 | 0 | 0 |
0.000 | 0 | 0 |
0.000 | 0 | 0 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 28/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
PAC (ASX) Chart |
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online