Again, I believe my assumptions are quite conservative.
For starters, I use 1.5% Pb+Zn cut-off because historic holes weren't assayed for precious metals and I don't have a sense for what the barite concentrate may be worth. If instead I were to use 1.5% ZnEq cut-off (inclusive of precious metals, copper and barite) you will see an expanded mineralized envelop and increased tonnage.
Also, I use very conservative lateral width assumptions. If instead I use 75m lateral width (hard to do because not enough infill holes to get a sense of lateral continuity vs very strong continuity along strike), I get 6.75Mt.
400m strike * 75m width * 60m depth * 3.75t/m^3 = 6.75Mt.
Finally, my understanding is that the block model may incorporate separate cut-offs: one for the near-surface, open-pittable portion and the other for the under-ground portion.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- ADT
- Updated Resource Estimate as at BR-17-18
Updated Resource Estimate as at BR-17-18, page-2
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 18 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add ADT (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
$4.10 |
Change
0.040(0.99%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.063B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$4.10 | $4.15 | $4.07 | $2.448M | 596.4K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 511 | $4.09 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$4.11 | 511 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 511 | 4.090 |
2 | 1711 | 4.080 |
2 | 1511 | 4.070 |
4 | 13962 | 4.060 |
2 | 10511 | 4.050 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
4.110 | 511 | 1 |
4.120 | 511 | 1 |
4.130 | 511 | 1 |
4.140 | 511 | 1 |
4.150 | 511 | 1 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 31/05/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
Last
$4.10 |
  |
Change
0.040 ( 1.18 %) |
|||
Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
$4.13 | $4.15 | $4.07 | 73081 | ||
Last updated 15.59pm 31/05/2024 ? |
Featured News
ADT (ASX) Chart |