Updates drill results, page-112

Morbid, they have focused on structure, not copper.

So they have been looking for host rock change, where mo is and isn't, where Phyllic alteration is and isn't etc

It is possible many assays will return features for honing on a porphyr versus copper itself.

Sadly investors just look at assay meters and grade and not the indicators.

Pre a resource find, it's all about tracers. Spqs exploration stage.

See these holes are not the porphyry minerals, but looking for them.

All I am looking for is good mo, in Phyllic alteration at depth, not at shallow. Ie closer.

Wallrock minerals as that will link to the core.
Ie closer.

Geologists won't care about lack of copper assays as they focus on tracers at this stage.

Hard to know what the market does Considering it's not been resource drilling like many think.

They nail the source, that's all we want. Then next round of drilling will be targeting it's minerals.

This is big. Surface soils 2km. Goes under alluvial cover in east.

Surface to 900m mineralisation and it's wall rock that links to source.

Hi mo at the 500m area. Phyllic alteration at depth.

A porphyry exists 100%.

New crest on Cadia got more crap holes than good, till they pinpointed it. Then bang it was on.

The thing with porphyry versus other deposits. Epithermal etc, is they are deep 1km or more, so the investor needs to understand that fact.