updates, page-4

nothing new that i can see.

a little intrigued as to why on Pg 4 they state drilling of SE222 (95Hec's) had been completed with RVK identified. Why than go on in the next sentence and describe it in further detail? Are they trying to pad something out?

What am i missing, it was tested, found to have RVK (great) but it is not a commercial kimberlite - that's the nuts and bolts of it, isn't it? At the very least the structure of thing should have the blurb about SE222 before the outcome, not the other way around.

What is going to bring home the Nov 27th bacon????