let's look at the upside via the down side
The downers have been going on and on about the issuance of shares; the legacy debt; the lack of profits...
But as our old chum Einstein taught us - 'everything is relative'
• yes there have been a large number of new shares issued - there were around 400 mill - then the sheet hit the fan - then the printing press turned on to salvage the business - and now we are at about 750 million shares on issue
• so the cost of saving the business was the issuance of 350 mill shares at a low price
• so if the business is now roaring back to life - as evidenced by consistent increases in monthly revenue - you must clearly connect the issuance of shares as a cost of recovery
• therefore, if the business is now recovered to near breakeven - 2 things must also be true:
1) the cost has been successful and now done - ie no more need to print shares
2) the business should now be measured by its revenue growth forwards - not its past costs
• EN1 MC - relative to past costs and future revenue growth is ridiculous
• the downers cant keep citing old spent news to prove a point today - the business has turned around!!!
you cant accuse a 6 foot 6 man of being a midget - because when he was 4 he was tiny!!!
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CTV
- Upside
Upside, page-45
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 54 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)