uranium at balama, page-51

Duke,
unfortunately this is just one more of your comments that is also not that close to any truth.

Mr. P. Siegfried is only interpreting the response from new high resolution airborne magnetic and radiometric data(obtained prior to Mar 26, 2007) to be the result of uranium present.

He also states in your reference, "Rock and soil sampling needs to be completed at the earliest opportunity to verify the airborne data"

SYR's drilling and assays to date have shown that negligible uranium has been found in the actual physical material..... in the ground...... and at depth.
Step 1 = tick

Mr. P. Siegfried also refers to, "The core of the largest of the two anomalies (identified by radiometric response over the Balama licence) is approximately 4km long by up to 500m wide, and is located in the central northern part of the licence. The smaller of the TWO ANOMOLIES is located 3km to the southwest, and measures approximately 1km x 500m."

and later states, "POTENTIAL targets would include structurally controlled and sediment hosted uranium mineralisation. According to Mr. Siegfried, the TWO ANOMOLOUS areas are related to:

1. vanadium bearing graphite schist units, and;
2. schists in contact with a late-stage highly fractionated granite."

To conclude dear duke, you need to remember that mr. siegfried was looking for uranium and was given a set of data that he interpreted could be what he was looking for. But, he also gave 2 suggest the cause of the TWO AMOMOLOUS are. One of which looks like it was spot on.

Well done Mr. P. Siegfried (B.Sc, M.Sc., MAusIMM.)