uranium debate on sunday program, page-4

  1. 5,391 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 1086
    Kincella it seems that your points are very one sided and I can only presume that you are against U.

    As far as U being used for nuclear weapons, I think that the rods need to be (in laments terms) used rods. That means, they have to be used by a power plant (as an example) and when they become unstable, they can then be used for other means (like for war).

    Being that Australia would never be party to selling U to a foreign Country that would either use it's on unstable rods or sell those rods to a third world country, we can feel at ease, that any mischief wont come from our side of the fence.


 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.