Wow you dont even know about atmospheric scrubbers for eudialyte chemical separation. You also say no fluorine used in the process. No silica formation. No HCl used Not even refractory etc etc All shown to you, to be inaccurate, in research papers posted here. I know you claim to have a eudialyte plot (and a chemistry teacher and "geologist") But it sure doesnt sound like you have any clue on what youre doing. or in any position of knowledge to advise ETM should be doing the same thing. Maybe this is why ETM wasnt interested in eudialyte and other operators got stuck with it.
Again stop comparing a simple crushing process of eudialyte REEs (before the full chemical separation) with the full chemical separation of steenstrupine. You just look desperately misleading even trying it on posters and potentially avoiding the truth you are therefore clearly hiding from..
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- ETM
- Uranium in South Greenland
Uranium in South Greenland, page-38
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add ETM (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
2.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $30.99M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
2.2¢ | 2.2¢ | 2.2¢ | $20 | 900 |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 832244 | 2.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
2.4¢ | 101094 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 832244 | 0.022 |
2 | 577254 | 0.021 |
2 | 2384005 | 0.020 |
6 | 1557772 | 0.019 |
3 | 1949857 | 0.018 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.024 | 101094 | 1 |
0.025 | 290329 | 7 |
0.028 | 1463126 | 3 |
0.029 | 120000 | 1 |
0.030 | 138094 | 2 |
Last trade - 10.49am 11/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
ETM (ASX) Chart |