I will say this one last time Pen. I am not here to save anyone...

I will say this one last time Pen. I am not here to save anyone from doom, demise or poor investment decisions. I am here to offer a view about PEN that is based on evidence. I am not about investigating and then prosecuting ever-more complicated up-ramping spin stories that require constant rebirth and rcycle when the previous "balanced" theory fails to confirm the prediction (or the hope). All theories previously presented by Gav (for example) have failed and it matters not, how warm and friendly he is or the style of writing and language he uses, his theories are not supported by the empirical evidence, or in plain language, they are wrong. And for the record, I have read every single one of Gav's posts since he joined the PEN debate. I supported a lot of what he said in the early days but over time, his rhetoric has not been supported by any evidence. Obviously I know disagree with his view - no crime in that.

My views are unpopular, I accept that, but honestly mate, they have been correct so far. Why do I think I have been (more) right than the protons? Because the evidence says so. If you choose to dis me for that factual outcome, and now turn to criticise my "style" then you have failed to engage in an intellectual debate to prove me wrong. If you disagree with my comments/assessment, prove me wrong with facts. But don't shutdown the debate with personal insults or your amateur psychiatric recommendation that I should change my ways. If my style is offensive and hurts peoples feelings, then use the ignore button.

If people on this forum read my stuff, great. If not, great.