as usual you pick and choose, one was someone pushing there own opinion ,while the other is an old newspaper article. Again you will not and can not provide any proof that eudialyte on the tanbreez license contains uranium even the newspaper article is on a different license.
also you can provide no evidence that etm is not looking for eudialyte if they were not then why did they appoint a eudialyte expert to the board.
i also note you will not comment on the case and what happens if they win or lose ,also I see a decade to sort it out what's your time line
as usual you pick and choose, one was someone pushing there own...
- There are more pages in this discussion • 35 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add ETM (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
2.5¢ |
Change
-0.002(7.41%) |
Mkt cap ! $35.11M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 2.6¢ | 2.7¢ | 2.5¢ | $41.47K | 1.638M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 298750 | 2.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 2.7¢ | 176931 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 14/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
|
Last
2.5¢ |
Change
-0.002 ( 7.41 %) |
||||
| Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
| 2.5¢ | 2.5¢ | 2.5¢ | 85328 | ||
| Last updated 10.30am 14/06/2024 ? | |||||
| ETM (ASX) Chart |