us carrier cruises through iranian war games, page-46

Hi Bruce

I would be happy to learn that the US isn't under Israeli control but from where I stand it seems that the US is Israel's bitch, with every(or damn near every ) congressman falling over themselves to kiss the Israeli flag and swear allegiance to Israel. Just the number of jews surrounding most presidents is telling. If instead of jews it were a similar number of say, Mormons or Scientologists or stamp collectors it would be equally inexplicable unless one could see the obvious.

Why did the US attack Iraq when it was not the enemy of the US and presented no threat to the US? Forget about WMD's and other garbage, that was simply the pretext for the attack. BTW, Nazis were hanged at Nuremberg for the same thing ie. waging a war of aggression, but then winners make the rules and losers swing.Iraq was a regional rival to Israel, which is why it was attacked, using american weapons, money and lives. Who is the master in this situation? Those fighting for another's benefit? I don't think so.

An indication of how much power wielded over the US by Israel is the USS Liberty incident during the 1967 war. No one gets to bomb and torpedo an american navy ship without repercussion, without some serious power. It was an effort to trick the US into believing it was an Egyptian attack and bring the US into the fighting on the Israeli side. What sort of country can get away with a stunt like that without serious power? The Lavon affair of 1954 was another false flag attack against the US in Egypt that came unstuck. No repercussions there either.
I am simply pointing out in the above couple of examples the power that Israel wields over the US. Added to that is the power of the media and Hollywood and Wall St and the sayanim network and what have you got?

As you brought up Saudi Arabia and their buying $30 bil of military gear. If Saudi were as powerful over the americans they would be given, not sold $30 bil of the best gear(and I very much doubt they got the "best"gear, adequate but not top shelf).
Here is a Haaretz article on the sale where Andrew J. Shapiro, the United States Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military Affairs says
"Let me just say that by law, all sales to the region must be evaluated for the impact on Israel’s qualitative military edge", he said. "We conducted that assessment, and we are satisfied that this sale to Saudi Arabia will not decrement Israel’s qualitative military edge". http://www.haaretz.com/news/middle-east/u-s-finalizes-30-billion-weapons-deal-with-saudi-arabia-1.404461
So, the client state (supposedly) gets to dictate terms to the donor. More accurate to simply see who runs the show.


cheers