Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

No, he doesn't. You are as presumptuously clueless as ever.

First 54 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
jantimot

30,924 Posts.

174

25/09/17

06:47

Post #: 27427782
Share

Originally posted by tigmeister ↑

It's a form of appearance. So the owner of land (or capital) believes he has earned the perpetual income stream owed to that asset. He has earned the future labour potential of others who need the use of this asset. Look at @jantimot's explosion at the suggestion of an Unconditional Basic Income or UBI. As an owner of land he feels entitled to the use of the labour potential of others who he feels that he has earned power over. The owner of capital reckons that others owe him labour. The very notion a UBI feels like a threat to the owed source of labour that the capitalist feels entitled to.

Expand

No, he doesn't. You are as presumptuously clueless as ever.
2 Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 17 more messages in this thread...

First 54 Last