I guess this all depends on each individuals definition of value. I for one try to be as objective and factual as possible with my posts, highlighting both the positives and the negatives, and if I see something wrong, I call it out. To me personally, that's what I see as value - genuine discussion on all things good and bad.
It appears however that you only see positive comments, like kicks, as value. Well it seems you are new here so let me help you with some history.
Exhibit A:
https://hotcopper.com.au/threads/market-update-soon.3158603/page-98?post_id=22358618Date: Feb-17. SP: 12.5c. Kick quote: "even 19c is undervalued"
Exhibit B:
https://hotcopper.com.au/threads/nuh-media-thread.3155798/page-4854?post_id=32678413Date: Apr-18. SP: 8.9c. Kick quote: "downside risk minimal. not much chance it getting to 5c" low since then was 1.2c
Exhibit C:
https://hotcopper.com.au/threads/nuh-media-thread.3155798/page-4858?post_id=32678938Date: Apr-18. SP: 8.9c. Kick quote: "i laugh at down rampers who one day will realise they could buy NUH under 10c" yikes
I think you need to reassess your definition of what value is. It took me 5 minutes to find these 3 posts, but a majority of Kicks 9k posts are about NUH so there is thousands of examples.
The reason I call out Kick is because he is the first to attack anyone who says anything negative about NUH. Then when I call him out he goes completely silent and hides for a day.
All I want from him is a genuine discussion about NUH. Not this same crap for 5 years.
(20min delay)