us heat wave, page-17

I agree Farmboy - some AGWers seem to thrive on partial truths but:

China emits around 23% and Austratlia a tiny 1.3%

So 5% of 1.3% is ridiculous and clearly not worth the financial merry-go-rounds and massive numbers of government departments to administer it.

They also like us to believe that any recent severe weather issues are caused by GW. On further investigation and as ZZedzz has pointed out - there have been worse weather issues in the past before warming was thought about to scam tax off hard working people.

When people have to resort to partial truths while conveniently leaving out the equally or more important part of the statement, how can anything about this tax be honest?

And why is the taxpayer funding partial truths in the carbon tax ads? See link below for a list:

http://www.australianclimatemadness.com/2011/07/clean-energy-future-advert-count-the-lies/