Personally -I think the point of this article was to take a jab...

Personally -I think the point of this article was to take a jab at Senstar.

Senstar - the company that "merged" with Optellios - whom FFT had a patent dispute with.

http://www.securityinfowatch.com/ne...ettles-lawsuit-with-optellios-over-736-patent

If FFT patent and tech is so great - why did Senstar do the deal with Optellios and not FFT...

"Senstar has sold products to a number of border security implementations over its 35-year history. It’s OmniTrax buried sensors have been used to secure 40-mile-long border section in a Middle Eastern country. Senstar has also secured borders in Eastern Europe, as well as North American border crossing, according to Miriam Rautiainen, Marketing Director for the company."

https://us.sourcesecurity.com/news/...gies-shoot-donald-trump-co-1090-ga.19574.html

FFT thinks it can compete with a company with 35years of history - in the same way AVA Global and BQT Solutions are currently competing with their competitors with decades of experience???

Senstar - the same company that passed FFT over and acquired a competitor - Optellios - whom FFT had a patent dispute with?

Call me a cynic - but doesn't that mean Senstar - a company with a 35 year history - sees no value in the FFT patents?

Hopefully there won't be any typos in those bidder and target statements.