US Nuclear Fuel Working Group, page-19

I might have jumped the gun here?
It appears that GLE could still be in there, but thta decision hasn't been part of this nuclear fuel working group.

The Administration will evaluate the impacts of the reserve and other policy measures to inform next steps within the proposed 10-year timeline. Factors that will be considered include status and conditions in other sectors of the front-end of the fuel supply, such as enrichment, as well as implications for other parts of the nuclear industry. For example, expansion of the existing American Assured Fuel Supply (AAFS), and merging it with the new Uranium Reserve to establish a unified reserve could be considered. The AAFS currently contains enough uranium for six reactor core reloads and a modified version could increase the number of reactor fuel reloads of enriched uranium substantially and could require those loads to contain a percentage of unobligated uranium, meaning uranium that is free of peaceful use restrictions established through international agreements. Further consideration to the evolving market needs, based on next-generation fuel and advanced reactor deployment would be also considered in any such action.


The Administration will evaluate the impacts of the reserve and other policy measures to inform next steps within the proposed 10-year timeline. Factors that will be considered include status and conditions in other sectors of the front-end of the fuel supply, such as enrichment.